MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214920207 · doi:10.3389/ffunb.2022.805127

Multiple Fungi May Connect the Roots of an Orchid (Cypripedium reginae) and Ash (Fraxinus nigra) in Western Newfoundland

2022· article· en· W4214920207 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nimalka Weerasuriya, Katarina Kukolj, R. R. Spencer, Dmitry Sveshnikov, R. Greg Thorn

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Fungal Biology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandWestern University
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsBiologyBotanyPlant use of endophytic fungi in defenseFraxinusOrchidaceaeEndophyteInternal transcribed spacerRibosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Showy lady's slipper ( Cypripedium reginae Walter, Orchidaceae) and black ash ( Fraxinus nigra Marshall, Oleaceae) often co-occur in close proximity in fens in western Newfoundland, Canada. Metabarcoding of DNA extracted from root samples of both species following surface sterilization, and others without surface sterilization was used to determine if there were shared fungal endophytes in the roots of both species that could form a common mycorrhizal network between them. A wide variety of fungi were recovered from primers amplifying the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS2). Sixty-six fungal sequences were shared by surface-sterilized roots of both orchid and ash, among them arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ( Claroideoglomus, Dominikia, Glomus and Rhizophagus ), ectomycorrhizal fungi ( Inocybe and Tomentella ), the broad-host root endophyte Cadophora orchidicola , along with root pathogens ( Dactylonectria, Ilyonectria, Pyricularia , and Xylomyces ) and fungi of unknown function. There appear to be multiple fungi that could form a common mycorrhizal network between C. reginae and F. nigra , which might explain their frequent co-occurrence. Transfer of nutrients or carbon between the orchid and ash via one or more of the shared fungal endophytes remains to be demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Fungal BiologySame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207