MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214920218 · doi:10.1002/acr.24877

Personalized Risk Model and Leveraging of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Structural Phenotypes and Clinical Factors to Predict Incidence of Radiographic Osteoarthritis

2022· article· en· W4214920218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jinhee J. Lee, Nikan K. Namiri, Thomas M. Link, Sharmila Majumdar, Valentina Pedoia

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis Care & Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisMagnetic resonance imagingHazard ratioProportional hazards modelRadiographyWOMACInternal medicineConfidence intervalKnee painMedial meniscusCartilageBody mass indexRetrospective cohort studyPathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to investigate the association between time to incidence of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based structural phenotypes proposed by the Rapid Osteoarthritis MRI Eligibility Score (ROAMES). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 2,328 participants without radiographic OA at baseline were selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative study. Utilizing a deep-learning model, we automatically assessed the presence of inflammatory, meniscus/cartilage, subchondral bone, and hypertrophic phenotypes from MRIs acquired at baseline and 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-, 72-, and 96-month follow-up visits. In addition to 4 structural phenotypes, we examined severe knee injury history and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores as time dependent. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to analyze the association between 4 structural phenotypes and radiographic OA disease-free survival, both univariate and adjusted for known risk factors including age, sex, race, body mass index, presence of Heberden's nodes, and knee malalignment. RESULTS: Inflammatory (hazard ratio [HR] 3.37 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.45-4.63]), meniscus/cartilage (HR 1.55 [95% CI 1.21-1.98]), and subchondral bone (HR 1.84 [95% CI 1.63-2.09]) phenotypes were associated with time to radiographic OA at P < 0.05 when adjusted for the risk factors. Sex was a modifier of hypertrophic phenotype association with time to radiographic OA. Female participants with the hypertrophic phenotype were associated with 2.8 times higher risk of radiographic OA (95% CI 2.25-7.54) compared to male participants without the hypertrophic phenotype. CONCLUSION: Four ROAMES phenotypes may contribute to time to radiographic OA incidence and if validated could be used as a promising tool for personalized OA management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis Care & ResearchSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207