MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214941797 · doi:10.1186/s40478-022-01328-5

Circular RNA detection identifies circPSEN1 alterations in brain specific to autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease

2022· article· en· W4214941797 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hsiang‐Han Chen, Abdallah M. Eteleeb, Ciyang Wang, María Victoria Fernández, John Budde, Kristy Bergmann, Joanne Norton, Fengxian Wang, Curtis Ebl, John C. Morris, Richard J. Perrin, Randall J. Bateman, Eric McDade, Chengjie Xiong, Alison Goate, Martin R. Farlow, Jasmeer P. Chhatwal, Peter R. Schofield, Helena C. Chui, Oscar Harari, Carlos Cruchaga, Laura Ibáñez

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Neuropathologica Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCircular RNAs in diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative ErkrankungenNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationHope Center for Neurological DisordersJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentFondation Brain CanadaBrightFocus FoundationFoundation for the National Institutes of HealthKorea Health Industry Development InstituteU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsNeurologyDiseaseNeuroscienceAlzheimer's diseaseMedicineBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) is caused by pathogenic mutations in APP , PSEN1 , and PSEN2 , which usually lead to an early age at onset (< 65). Circular RNAs are a family of non-coding RNAs highly expressed in the nervous system and especially in synapses. We aimed to investigate differences in brain gene expression of linear and circular transcripts from the three ADAD genes in controls, sporadic AD, and ADAD. Methods We obtained and sequenced RNA from brain cortex using standard protocols. Linear counts were obtained using the TOPMed pipeline; circular counts, using python package DCC. After stringent quality control (QC), we obtained the counts for PSEN1 , PSEN2 and APP genes. Only circ PSEN1 passed QC. We used DESeq2 to compare the counts across groups, correcting for biological and technical variables. Finally, we performed in-silico functional analyses using the Circular RNA interactome website and DIANA mirPath software. Results Our results show significant differences in gene counts of circ PSEN1 in ADAD individuals, when compared to sporadic AD and controls (ADAD = 21, AD = 253, Controls = 23—ADADvsCO: log 2 FC = 0.794, p = 1.63 × 10 –04 , ADADvsAD: log 2 FC = 0.602, p = 8.22 × 10 –04 ). The high gene counts are contributed by two circ PSEN1 species (hsa_circ_0008521 and hsa_circ_0003848). No significant differences were observed in linear PSEN1 gene expression between cases and controls, indicating that this finding is specific to the circular forms. In addition, the high circ PSEN1 levels do not seem to be specific to PSEN1 mutation carriers; the counts are also elevated in APP and PSEN2 mutation carriers. In-silico functional analyses suggest that circ PSEN1 is involved in several pathways such as axon guidance ( p = 3.39 × 10 –07 ), hippo signaling pathway ( p = 7.38 × 10 –07 ), lysine degradation (p = 2.48 × 10 –05 ) or Wnt signaling pathway ( p = 5.58 × 10 –04 ) among other KEGG pathways. Additionally, circ PSEN1 counts were able to discriminate ADAD from sporadic AD and controls with an AUC above 0.70. Conclusions Our findings show the differential expression of circ PSEN1 is increased in ADAD. Given the biological function previously ascribed to circular RNAs and the results of our in-silico analyses, we hypothesize that this finding might be related to neuroinflammatory events that lead or that are caused by the accumulation of amyloid-beta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Neuropathologica CommunicationsSame topicCircular RNAs in diseasesFrench-language works237,207