MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214944413 · doi:10.18260/1-2--36561

A Combined E-Portfolio and Microcredentialing Tool for Engineering Identities and Career Pathways

2021· article· en· W4214944413 on OpenAlex
Shivam Jindal, Jack Bringardner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersAmerican Society for Engineering Education
KeywordsCourseworkPortfolioCredentialingPopularityCareer PathwaysComputer scienceCareer portfolioProfessional developmentMedical educationPedagogyPsychologyCareer developmentBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work in progress paper describes a study of student use of e-portfolio and micro-credentialing resources for identifying academic and professional pathways. Micro-credentials and e-portfolios are popular resources for students and engineering industry professionals to demonstrate and verify one's skills and experiences beyond the classroom. A study was conducted at NYU Tandon School of Engineering and found students lack support in identifying and developing their career pathways. This study indicates that a combined e-portfolio and micro-credentialing platform could benefit students by a) providing students with a tool to reflect on and showcase their experiences, b) matching students with upper-class and alumni mentors in career pathways they are interested in, and c) providing them with curated lists of on-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it