MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220654469 · doi:10.5206/ijoh.2022.1.13692

Impactos da COVID-19 Sobre Crianças e Adolescentes em Situação de Rua em São Paulo na Perspectiva de Profissionais que Atuam Com Essa População

2022· article· pt· W4220654469 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michiko Shiroma de Carvalho, Liliana Mantoni, Gabriela Milare Camargo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Homelessness · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho é resultado parcial de uma pesquisa que aborda os efeitos da COVID-19 sobre crianças e adolescentes em situação de rua na área central da cidade de São Paulo. A pesquisa baseou-se no relato de profissionais envolvidos no atendimento de crianças e adolescentes acolhidos em instituições e aquelas que permaneceram nas ruas durante a pandemia. Os relatos apontam para impactos diferentes entre os dois grupos de crianças e adolescentes. Os/as que permaneceram nas ruas sofreram com o trabalho remoto dos/as educadores/as, e com o fechamento do comércio e esvaziamento das ruas na região central, o que reduziu suas fontes de renda e de alimentação, além de ficarem mais expostos à violência e ao consumo de drogas. Nas instituições, as rotinas foram adaptadas às exigências protocolares de higienização, limitação de saídas e de visitas familiares e as crianças tiveram prejuízos escolares com aulas à distância sem ter equipamentos necessários e familiaridade com esse tipo de ensino. Além disso, constatou-se um fluxo maior de entradas e saídas entre as crianças e adolescentes com trajetória de rua. This work is the partial results of a research project that addresses the effects of COVID-19 on children and adolescents in street situation in the central area of the city of São Paulo. The research was based on the reports of professionals involved in the care of children and adolescents in shelters and those who remained on the streets during the pandemic. The reports point to different impacts between the two groups of children and adolescents. Those who remained on the streets suffered from the remote work of educators, closure of businesses, and emptying of the streets in the central region, which reduced their sources of income and food, besides being more exposed to violence and drug use. In the institutions, routines were adapted to the protocol requirements of hygiene, limitation of departures, and family visits, and children were detrimentally affected by remote learning since they did not have the necessary equipment and were not familiar with this type of teaching. In addition, there was a greater flow of entrances and exits among children and adolescents with street trajectories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal on HomelessnessSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207