Liquid Crystalline Composite Stabilized by Epoxy Polymer with Boscage‐Like Morphology for Energy‐Efficient Smart Windows with High Stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Smart windows, which can provide comfortable indoor conditions for cars or buildings and protect the privacy of people, have attracted much attention. Traditional acrylate‐based smart windows have the disadvantages of high energy consumption and poor stability. Herein, an energy‐efficient smart window based on a liquid crystalline composite stabilized by an epoxy polymer with boscage‐like morphology is reported. This epoxy polymer is prepared by cationic polymerization of the liquid crystalline epoxy monomer E6M in vertically oriented negative nematic liquid crystals. The orientation of the liquid crystals is controlled by the epoxy polymer, which makes the composite film transparent and switchable to scattering by an electric field. Therefore, the composite film can be used in an energy‐efficient reverse‐mode smart window. The reverse‐mode smart window has better cycling stability than does acrylate, owing to the better mechanical properties endowed by the polymer matrix with a unique morphology and high stress tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".