MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220661073 · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2022.03.001

Accessibility of psychiatric vocabulary: An international study about schizophrenia essential features

2022· letter· en· W4220661073 on OpenAlexaff
Françoise Askevis-Leherpeux, Jean‐Baptiste Hazo, Mohamed Agoub, Victoria Barikova, Dalila Benmessaoud, Floriane Brunet, Mauro-Giovanni Carta, Giulio Castelpietra, David Crepaz‐Keay, Nicolas Daumerie, Vincent Demassiet, Audrey Fontaine, Neringa Grigutytė, Mathilde Guernut, Jugal Kishore, Márta Kiss, Marc Laporta, Elkhansaa Layoussif, Youssouf Limane, Marcelino López, Gioia Mura, Jean‐François Pelletier, Mbolatiana Raharinivo, Geoffrey M. Reed, Sami Richa, Rebecca Robles-Garcia, Shekhar Saxena, Marina Skourteli, Fabio Tassi, Anne‐Claire Stona, Catherine Thévenon, Michel Triantafyllou, Fotis Vasilopoulos, Stéphanie Wooley, Jean-Luc Roelandt

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Research · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecMcGill University
FundersMinistère des Affaires Sociales et de la SantéWorld Health Organization
KeywordsPsychosisThalamusSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)GlutaminePsychologyInternal medicineGlutamate receptorAnalysis of variancePostmortem studiesNeuroscienceClinical psychologyEndocrinologyMedicineAudiologyPsychiatryBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia ResearchSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207