MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220665508 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs221611126

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Fetal and Maternal Outcomes of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study in Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex, Nowshera

2022· article· en· W4220665508 on OpenAlexaff
Javeria Saleem, Shahzadi Neelum, Sumayya, Noor Ul Amina, Salma Naz, Yasmeen Fazal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyObstetricsCaesarean sectionRetrospective cohort studyComplicationHypertensive disorderCohortCohort studyPediatricsPreeclampsiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To determine the prevalence, risk factors with maternal and fetal outcomes of hypertension in pregnancy. Type of Study: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Place of Study: Gynae A ward,Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex, Nowshera. Duration of Study: 1 year from 1st Jan,2019 to 31st Dec, 2019. Methodology: 552 patients who had hypertensive disorders in pregnancy were recruited. Self- administered and structured questionnaire was used for data collection. The risk factors in patients and the fetomaternal outcomes were manually extracted from the history sheets and evaluated. SPSS version 22.0 was used for data analysis. Results: The prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was 13.9% in this study. Pregnancy induced hypertension was the most frequent hypertensive disorder with a prevalence of 57.97%. 61% of the total hypertensive patients had no antenatal booking making it the most common risk factors in pregnant hypertensive patients.38% of patients had high blood pressure in previous pregnancies as well. 56.5% of patients admitted had normal vaginal delivery,4.5% of patients had instrumental deliveryand 39% had lower segment caesarean section. 17.75% of the total patientsdeveloped maternal complications and among them the most frequent maternal complication was post-partum hemorrhage (7.4%).49.3% newborns developed neonatal complications where the most common neonatal complication was preterm deliveries (21.9%). Conclusion: The prevalence of hypertensive disorders was relatively high in our cohort. However, to reduce the feto-maternal morbidities and mortalities, awareness regarding hypertensive disorders should be increased at the community and hospital level and screening of this disorder should be proposed at early gestation. Keywords: Hypertension, Pregnancy induced hypertension, Pre-eclampsia, Eclampsia, maternal complications, fetal complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→