MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220671694 · doi:10.1002/acm2.13598

Automated conversion of Millennium‐120 VMAT plans to HDMLC geometry: Software development and treatment of first patients

2022· article· en· W4220671694 on OpenAlexaff
Ray Yeng Yang, M Lamey, Leigh Bartha, Michael R. Johnston, Alexandra Warburton, Dawn Gillund, Nathan Becker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaInterior Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultileaf collimatorComputer scienceLinear particle acceleratorNuclear medicineQuality assuranceSABR volatility modelMathematicsMedical physicsPhysicsBeam (structure)MedicineOpticsOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To provide plan backup resiliency for patients treated on a solitary high definition multileaf collimator (HDMLC) linac by developing a fully integrated Eclipse script, which converts patient plans initially optimized on Millennium-120 (M120) MLC to dosimetrically equivalent leaf motions for delivery on HDMLC. In the event of HDMLC machine downtime, affected patients can be transferred to Millennium-120 units, and their backup plan delivered without delay. METHODS: Write-enabled Eclipse scripting is leveraged to generate HDMLC treatment fields with control points parameterized to mimic apertures of an existing Millennium-120 VMAT plan. Non-parity between intermediate control point gantry angles of script generated arcs relative to VMAT is reconciled through an interpolation subroutine to correct for the apertures and monitor units that would have existed at intermediate angles. Differences in dosimetric leaf gap are corrected by displacing the subset of leaves undergoing dynamic motion. A nominal change to plan normalization corrects for remaining discrepancies between beam models. RESULTS: Over 220 non-SABR VMAT patients were treated on a solitary HDMLC linac with plans converted using the developed script. All have undergone streamlined RO review and physics quality assurance (QA), where the converted plan replicates the original leaf patterns, representing a minor dosimetric perturbation. Analyzing a subset of converted plans delivered at four anatomical sites, on average 99.3% of points pass the 1%/1 mm gamma criterion. Dose-volume histograms between the original and converted plans are in excellent agreement. ArcCheck measurements comparing delivery of the converted HDMLC plan to the calculated M120 dose distribution averaged a gamma pass rate of 99.4% (95.2%) at a 3%/3 mm (2%/2 mm) criterion. The conversion process takes 30 s to run, avoids errors in exporting/re-importing, and generates leaf motions deliverable within machine limits. CONCLUSION: The methodology developed for automated plan conversion helped maximize the utilization of a solitary HDMLC linac, while preserving backup interoperability with minimal overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207