Abstract P5-13-25: <i>PIK3CA</i> registry: A noninterventional, descriptive, retrospective cohort study of <i>PIK3CA</i> mutations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: PIK3CA mutations (mut) occur in ~40% of patients (pts) with HR+, HER2- ABC, and lead to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway hyperactivation, endocrine resistance, and poor survival in advanced disease. Alpelisib, an α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader, demonstrated efficacy in combination with fulvestrant in the Phase III SOLAR-1 trial in pts with PIK3CA-mut HR+, HER2- ABC. Notably, treatment benefit was not seen in pts without PIK3CA-mut tumors. Expert guidelines now recommend testing for PIK3CA mut at advanced diagnosis; however, data on PIK3CA mut prevalence in a broader population outside of clinical trials are limited. This real-world study snapshot describes the global prevalence of PIK3CA mut across geographic areas in HR+, HER2- ABC. Methods: This noninterventional, retrospective cohort study of ~2,000 adults (≥18 years) in ~20 countries from Europe, Asia, Middle East (ME), and Latin America (LA) is assessing the frequency of PIK3CA mut in HR+, HER2- ABC. Key inclusion criteria are histologically/cytologically confirmed estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive and HER2- ABC with available fresh or archival tumor tissue. The primary endpoint is the percentage of pts with PIK3CA-mut tumors, specifying each hotspot. Key secondary endpoints include the percentage of pts with PIK3CA-mut tumors by geographic region, demographics by PIK3CA status, clinical characteristics, number of lines of treatment in the advanced setting, and time to subsequent treatment by PIK3CA status. Tumor tissue samples are assessed at a local laboratory, at a minimum, for PIK3CA mut in C420R, E542K, E545A/D/G/K, Q546E/R, and H1047L/R/Y. All statistical analyses are descriptive, and the prognostic role of PIK3CA mut will be evaluated in the final analysis. Results: As of data cut-off (03 May 2021), 1,361 pts were enrolled in the Full Analysis Set, 574 (42.2%) of whom have tumors harboring a PIK3CA mut. Table 1 summarizes demographics and baseline characteristics in the mut and non-mut cohorts. Polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing were the common methods used to assess PIK3CA mut in 570 (41.9%) and 625 (45.9%) of pts, respectively. PIK3CA mut rates are generally consistent across regions (30.7-44.0%, Table 2). Table 2 shows sample types and most common biomarker muts. Conclusions: In this study, PIK3CA mut rates, 43.0% in Asia, 44.0% in Europe, 40.9% in LA, and 30.7% in ME, were consistent across regions and closely followed previous reports, supporting the prevalence of this mut outside the trial setting and in a more diverse real-world pt population. The most common PIK3CA muts found in this study were H1047R, E545K, and E542K, consistent with SOLAR-1. PIK3CA mut rates were comparable in primary vs metastatic samples, supporting the existing body of evidence that PIK3CA mut are truncal and can be tested on any available tissue. Further analysis, including treatment-related information, will be presented. Table 1.Demographics, baseline characteristics, and disease history (Full Analysis Set)Mutant PIK3CANon-mutant PIK3CAAll patientsn=574n=787N=1,361Median age (range) at early disease diagnosisa50.0 (28.0-85.0)51.0 (23.0-83.0)51.0 (23.0-85.0)Median age (range) at advanced disease diagnosis57.0 (26.0-89.0)55.5 (23.0-87.0)56.0 (23.0-89.0)Median age (range) at enrollment59.5 (27.0-89.0)59.0 (23.0-87.0)59.0 (23.0-89.0)Sex, n (%)Female566 (98.6)778 (98.9)1,344 (98.8)Male8 (1.4)8 (1.0)16 (1.2)Unknown01 (0.1)1 (0.1)Race, n (%)White294 (51.2)418 (53.1)712 (52.3)Asian183 (31.9)239 (30.4)422 (31.0)Black or African American5 (0.9)13 (1.7)18 (1.3)Multiple1 (0.2)0 (0.0)1 (0.1)Unknown91 (15.9)117 (14.9)208 (15.3)Menopausal status at advanced disease diagnosis, n (%)bMutant PIK3CANon-mutant PIK3CAAll patientsn=566n=778N=1,344Postmenopausal410 (72.4)554 (71.2)964 (71.7)Premenopausal146 (25.8)214 (27.5)360 (26.8)Stage at initial diagnosis, n (%)Mutant PIK3CANon-mutant PIK3CAAll patientsn=574n=787N=1,361Recurrent breast cancerc299 (52.1)414 (52.6)713 (52.4)De novo advanced breast cancerd265 (46.2)357 (45.4)622 (45.7)Unknown10 (1.7)16 (2.0)26 (1.9)Time from early diagnosis to advanced disease, n (%)&lt;1 year32 (5.6)33 (4.2)65 (4.8)1 to &lt;2 years25 (4.4)25 (3.2)50 (3.7)2 to &lt;3 years29 (5.1)40 (5.1)69 (5.1)≥ 3 years149 (26.0)214 (27.2)363 (26.7)Extent of metastatic disease, n (%)Bone390 (67.9)456 (57.9)846 (62.2)Liver141 (24.6)204 (25.9)345 (25.3)Lung171 (29.8)245 (31.1)416 (30.6)Other127 (22.1)155 (19.7)282 (20.7)Number of metastatic sites, n (%)013 (2.3)21 (2.7)34 (2.5)1229 (39.9)324 (41.2)553 (40.6)&gt;1332 (57.8)442 (56.2)774 (56.9)aCensored patients initially diagnosed as de novo advanced breast cancer.bMenopausal status is applicable only to female patients. Sites are provided the option to choose from 1) Able to bear children, 2) Post-menopausal, or 3) Sterile - of childbearing age.cStage 0-IIIA at initial diagnosis.dStage IIIB, IIIC, or IV at initial diagnosis. Table 2.PIK3CA mutation status by region and sample typeFrequency of mutant PIK3CA by regionMutant/Number of patients% (95% CI)All patients574/1,36142.2 (39.5-44.9)Asia193/44943.0 (38.4-47.7)Europe312/70944.0 (40.3-47.8)Latin America27/6640.9 (29.0-53.7)Middle East42/13730.7 (23.1-39.1)Mutant PIK3CANon-mutant PIK3CAAll patientsn=574n=787N=1,361Region, n (%)Asia193 (33.6)256 (32.5)449 (33.0)Europe312 (54.4)397 (50.4)709 (52.1)Latin America27 (4.7)39 (5.0)66 (4.8)Middle East42 (7.3)95 (12.1)137 (10.1)Tumor tissue type, n (%)Archival tumor536 (93.4)754 (95.8)1,290 (94.8)Newly obtained tumor sample38 (6.6)33 (4.2)71 (5.2)Source of tumor biopsy, n (%)Primary372 (64.8)496 (63.0)868 (63.8)Metastatic202 (35.2)291 (37.0)493 (36.2)Most common PIK3CA mutationsa, n (%); 95% CIbH1047R197 (34.3); 95% CI (30.4-38.4)0197 (14.5); 95% CI (12.6-16.5)E545K100 (17.4); 95% CI (14.4-20.8)0100 (7.3); 95% CI (6.0-8.9)E542K66 (11.5); 95% CI (9.0-14.4)066 (4.8); 95% CI (3.8-6.1)aIncludes patients with double or multiple mutations.b95% Confidence Interval (CI) is calculated using exact binomial method. Citation Format: Pathmanathan Rajadurai, Tatiana Semiglazova, Alinta Hegmane, Fadi El Karak, Joanne W Chiu, Sudeep Gupta, Hamdy A Azim, Josef JEM Kitzen, Antoine Arnaud, Sina Haftchenary, Jiwen Wu, Lakshmi Menon-Singh, LaTonya Smith, Lyudmila Zhukova. PIK3CA registry: A noninterventional, descriptive, retrospective cohort study of PIK3CA mutations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-25.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".