Coaptation length predicts early- and intermediate-term durability following degenerative mitral repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The impact of coaptation length on recurrent mitral regurgitation following degenerative mitral repair is not fully understood. METHODS: Between May 2008 and February 2021, 386 consecutive patients underwent mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation at a single centre. We compared patients with a post-repair coaptation length >11 mm (long-coaptation group, n = 230) and ≤11 mm (short-coaptation group, n = 156). The coaptation length cutoff was selected based on published postoperative transesophageal echocardiographic measurement of mitral repair patients and healthy controls. Propensity score with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses were performed. The median duration of clinical follow-up was 41 months and follow-up was complete in the entire cohort. RESULTS: The long-coaptation patients underwent more neochord implantation (89% vs 65%, P < 0.001) and less leaflet resection (11% vs 29%, P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital/30-day mortality and mitral reintervention occurred in 3 (1%) and 4 (1%) patients, respectively, and freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation was 98% at 1 year and 94% at 5 years. Freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation moderate or greater was significantly higher in the long-coaptation patients (IPTW-adjusted difference in average time to recurrent mitral regurgitation: 31 months, 95% confidence interval 9-53, P = 0.006). However, there was no difference in intermediate-term survival between both groups (IPTW-adjusted difference in average time to death: 9.5 months, 95% confidence interval -27 to 46, P = 0.61). Stratified analysis and pairwise comparison of different coaptation intervals also appeared to support the protective effect of longer coaptation on repair durability. CONCLUSIONS: Longer coaptation length appears to be associated with improved intermediate-term durability after mitral repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".