MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220689979 · doi:10.1029/2022je007180

Low Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Dioxide at High Pressure: Implications for Icy Planetary Interiors

2022· article· en· W4220689979 on OpenAlexafffund
S. R. Shieh, Wen‐Pin Hsieh, Yi‐Chih Tsao, Christian P. Crisostomo, Han Hsu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Planets · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia SinicaMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAcademia Sinica
KeywordsThermal conductivityMaterials scienceCarbon dioxideThermalThermal conductionThermodynamicsPlanetAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComposite materialPhysicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Carbon dioxide is commonly found in terrestrial planets and its thermal property is relevant to the dynamics and evolution of those terrestrial planets. In this work, we combine time‐domain thermoreflectance measurements and first‐principles calculations to determine the thermal conductivity of CO 2 up to 70 GPa at room temperature. Our results show that the thermal conductivity of liquid CO 2 is ∼0.22 W m −1 K −1 at 0.3–0.5 GPa and increases to ∼0.28 W m −1 K −1 when the liquid CO 2 transforms into molecular solid phase I (dry ice). Upon further compression, the mean value of thermal conductivity of phase I increases to 1.4–2.1 W m −1 K −1 at ∼10 GPa and then slightly drops across the phase I‐III boundary. Phase III exhibits a gentle increase of thermal conductivity with pressure and reaches to a maximum value of ∼4 W m −1 K −1 at ∼45 GPa, but shows an abrupt drop when transforming into a non‐molecular amorphous solid. The pressure evolution of CO 2 thermal conductivity across different phases may have significant implications for the heat flow and temperature distribution in the interiors of planets and moons containing CO 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research PlanetsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207