MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220703582 · doi:10.1029/2021gb007185

Interannual Variability in Methane and Nitrous Oxide Concentrations and Sea‐Air Fluxes Across the North American Arctic Ocean (2015–2019)

2022· article· en· W4220703582 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cara C. Manning, Zhiyin Zheng, Lindsay Fenwick, Ross D. McCulloch, Ellen Damm, Robert Izett, William J. Williams, Sarah Zimmermann, Svein Vagle, Philippe D. Tortell

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArcticNet
KeywordsArcticWater columnOceanographyEnvironmental scienceBeaufort seaTrace gasMethaneArctic geoengineeringCanada BasinFlux (metallurgy)SeawaterGeologyAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyArctic ice packChemistryDrift ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Between 2015 and 2018, we collected approximately 2,000 water column measurements of methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) concentrations in the North American Arctic Ocean during summer and early fall. We also obtained 25 measurements of CH 4 and N 2 O concentrations in rivers along the Northwest Passage and Ellesmere Island in midsummer 2017–2019. Our results show that N 2 O is generated in the highly productive Bering and Chukchi Seas and transported northeastward, producing a persistent subsurface N 2 O peak in the Beaufort Sea. The Chukchi and Beaufort Sea sediments are a significant source of CH 4 to the water column. These sedimentary sources and associated water column consumption display significant spatial gradients and interannual variability. CH 4 isotope data demonstrate the importance of CH 4 oxidation across the study region. We find that rivers are not a significant source of CH 4 or N 2 O to the Arctic Ocean at the time of year sampled. The estimated annual sea‐air flux across the study region (2.3 million km 2 ) had a median (first quartile, third quartile) of 0.009 (0.002, 0.023) Tg CH 4 y −1 and −0.003 (−0.013, 0.010) Tg N y −1 . These results suggest that the North American Arctic Ocean currently plays a negligible role in global CH 4 and N 2 O budgets. Our expansive data set, with observations at many repeat stations, provides a synopsis of present‐day Arctic CH 4 and N 2 O distributions and their range of variability, as well as a benchmark against which future climate‐dependent changes can be evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207