In-vivo functional and structural retinal imaging using multiwavelength photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many important eye diseases as well as systemic disorders manifest themselves in the retina. Retinal imaging technologies are rapidly growing and can provide ever-increasing amounts of information about the structure, function, and molecular composition of retinal tissue in-vivo. Photoacoustic remote sensing (PARS) is a novel imaging modality based on all-optical detection of photoacoustic signals, which makes it suitable for a wide range of medical applications. In this study, PARS is applied for in-vivo imaging of the retina and estimating oxygen saturation in the retinal vasculature. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a non-contact photoacoustic imaging technique is applied for in-vivo imaging of the retina. Here, optical coherence tomography is also used as a well-established retinal imaging technique to navigate the PARS imaging beams and demonstrate the capabilities of the optical imaging setup. The system is applied for in-vivo imaging of both microanatomy and the microvasculature of the retina. The developed system has the potential to advance the understanding of the ocular environment and to help in monitoring of ophthalmic diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".