Physical and Mechanical Properties of Oriented Strand Board Made from Eastern Canadian Softwood Species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the feasibility of producing OSB from softwood species used in the Eastern Canadian softwood lumber industry in the context of the overcapacity of softwood chips traditionally produced for the pulp and paper industry. Balsam fir, black spruce, and jack pine logs were used to make 15 mm thick OSB panels with a target density of 600 kg/m3. The panels were manufactured at a temperature of 210 °C during a pressing cycle of 300 s. Strands with different thicknesses were used to obtain a constant specific surface of 6.7 m2/kg for the three species. The bending modulus of the rupture and modulus of elasticity, internal bond, and thickness swelling of the OSB panels were determined and compared to the CSA standard requirements. The species significantly affected the physical and mechanical properties of OSB. The bending properties of OSB decreased with an increase in the species wood density. The internal bond strength of OSB increased with the increase in species wood density. The panels made from softwood species showed physical and mechanical properties exceeding the standard requirements, except for high thickness swelling. The combination of softwood and aspen strands significantly improved the thickness swelling of softwood-based OSB. The reduction in the surface layer density could also be explored to reduce the thickness swelling of the OSB made from the softwoods considered in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".