MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220744003 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-13474

Global blue and green water cycles exit from pre-industrial variation – freshwater change planetary boundary exceeded?

2022· preprint· en· W4220744003 on OpenAlexaff
Miina Porkka, Vili Virkki, Lan Wang‐Erlandsson, Chinchu Mohan, Tom Gleeson, Dieter Gerten, Matti Kummu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater cycleEnvironmental scienceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cycling of water supports a wide array of Earth system functions ranging from ecosystem provision to regulating greenhouse gas fluxes. While justifiably included in the planetary boundaries framework, the current freshwater planetary boundary fails in recognising the interplay between local and global drivers modifying the water cycle. Building on recent conceptual work and considering an extended selection of Earth system functions, we propose quantitative indicators for blue and green water to measure and monitor water cycle modifications. These indicators can capture changes at local, regional, or planetary scales, offering a robust and easily measurable way of determining alterations in the water cycle. Our data consisted of discharge (blue water) and root-zone soil moisture (green water) simulated by state-of-the-art gridded global hydrological models in ISIMIP 2b. Initiating our analysis at the 30-arcmin grid scale, we set cell-wise dry (5th percentile) and wet (95th percentile) local bounds based on pre-industrial (1681–1860) data, separately for blue and green water. We then determined cell-wise exits from these local bounds of baseline variability and aggregated them at the global scale. This resulted in a time series of the percentage of global land area where blue or green water anomalies exit local bounds of baseline variability. The 95th percentile of these global baseline departures was then set as the safe limit of water cycle modifications. Finally, to estimate the state of the water cycle, we compared the recent past (1881–2005) blue and green water conditions to the pre-industrial conditions. First, we determined cell-wise exits from the local bounds and then aggregated the global baseline departures to compare those with the safe limits. We show that in all aspects - blue and green water and dry and wet anomalies - the global water cycle has undergone substantial changes and transgressed the safe limits. This is a result of a gradual change throughout the 20th century. For blue water, drying conditions dominate along the mid-latitudes, whereas for green water, large-scale wetting prevails in the Northern Hemisphere boreal regions. Major changes in both blue and green water conditions co-occur commonly around regions with the highest anthropogenic pressures. Overall, global changes especially towards drier blue water conditions and wetter green water conditions have gone far beyond the pre-industrial levels - therefore placing the water cycle in a state unknown to modern societies. Our results underline the necessity and urgency to update the freshwater change planetary boundary. As both blue and green water cycles have entered an unprecedented state following a long and gradual change, Earth system functions upkept by the water cycle may already be or become compromised. While further studies are required to assess the status of the freshwater change planetary boundary alongside other boundaries to provide a comprehensive analysis on total Earth system resilience, our results clearly show that the global water cycle is changing towards the unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→