MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220747706 · doi:10.1007/s40065-022-00366-0

RETRACTED ARTICLE: An elementary proof of the Brouwer’s fixed point theorem

2022· article· en· W4220747706 on OpenAlexaff
Hichem Ben-El-Mechaieh, Yusef A. Mechaiekh

Post-publication record

OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArabian Journal of Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFunctional Equations Stability Results
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsElementary proofSocial connectednessFixed-point theoremBrouwer fixed-point theoremCompact spaceLefschetz fixed-point theoremFixed pointKakutani fixed-point theoremDiscrete mathematicsFixed-point propertySet (abstract data type)Point (geometry)Topology (electrical circuits)Schauder fixed point theoremPure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We provide an elementary proof of the Brouwer’s fixed point theorem based solely on introductory topological concepts such as compactness and connectedness both covered in a first undergraduate course in point-set topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArabian Journal of MathematicsSame topicFunctional Equations Stability ResultsFrench-language works237,207