Eoarchean subduction-like magmatism recorded in 3750 Ma mafic–ultramafic rocks of the Ukaliq supracrustal belt (Québec)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Our understanding of the nature of crustal formation in the Eoarchean is limited by the scarcity and poor preservation of the oldest rocks and variable and imperfect preservation of protolith magmatic signatures. These limitations hamper our ability to place quantitative constraints on thermomechanical models for early crustal genesis and hence on the operative geodynamic regimes at that time. The recently discovered ca. 3.75 Ga Ukaliq supracrustal enclave (northern Québec) is mainly composed of variably deformed and compositionally diverse serpentinized ultramafic rocks and amphibolitized mafic schists whose metamorphic peak, inferred from phase equilibria modeling, was below 720 °C. Inferred protoliths to the Ukaliq ultramafic rocks include cumulative dunites, pyroxenites, and gabbros, whereas the mafic rocks were probably picrites, basalts, and basaltic andesites. The bulk-rock and mineral chemistry documents the partial preservation of cumulative pyroxenes and probably amphiboles and demonstrates the occurrence of a clinopyroxene-dominated, tholeiitic suite and an orthopyroxene-dominated, boninite-like suite. Together with the presence of negative μ142Nd anomalies in the boninitic basalts, two liquid lines of descent are inferred: (i) a damp tholeiitic sequence resulting from the fractionation of a basaltic liquid produced by mantle decompression; and (ii) a boninitic suite documenting the evolution of an initially primitive basaltic andesite liquid produced by flux melting. Petrographic observations, thermodynamic modeling, bulk-rock and mineral chemistry, and 142Nd isotopic compositions identify the Ukaliq supracrustal belt as the remnant of an Eoarchean arc crust produced by the recycling of Hadean crust in a similar way as modern-style subduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".