MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220762381 · doi:10.1364/optcon.452020

Highly sensitive double D-shaped channel photonic crystal fiber based plasmonic refractive index sensor

2022· article· en· W4220762381 on OpenAlexaff
M. Ifaz Ahmad Isti, M. Hussayeen Khan Anik, Samiha Nuzhat, R. C. Talukder, Sadia Sultana, Shovasis Kumar Biswas, Hriteshwar Talukder

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Continuum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersIndependent University, BangladeshShahjalal University of Science and Technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceRefractive indexSurface plasmon resonancePhotonic-crystal fiberPlasmonOpticsWavelengthAnalyteSurface plasmon polaritonOptoelectronicsSurface plasmonMetamaterialOptical fiberNanoparticleNanotechnologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a highly sensitive miniaturized surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based photonic crystal fiber (PCF) sensor is presented for a wide range of analyte sensing. Gold is selected as the plasmonic metal for its higher chemical stability and titanium oxide works as the adhesive layer for gold attachment on silica. The plasmonic metal and the sensing medium are placed exterior to the surface of the sensor design to make it fitting for practical applications. By a careful arrangement of the periodic arrangement of the refractive index in the design, the generation of the evanescent fields is fine-tuned to obtain the phase matching between the leaky core guided mode and the surface plasmon polariton (SPP) mode. Numerical simulations have been carried out by employing the finite element method (FEM) with the consideration of a perfectly matched layer (PML) to absorb surface radiations. The proposed sensor shows a maximum wavelength sensitivity of 34,000 nm/RIU (refractive index units) and a maximum amplitude sensitivity of 331 RIU−1, investigated by using the wavelength and the amplitude interrogation methods, respectively, for the analyte sensing range of 1.16 to 1.37 RI (refractive index). The sensor also exhibits a wavelength resolution of 2.94×10−6 RIU which indicates a high detection accuracy. On that, the proposed sensor would be an excellent candidate for a wide range of RI detection, applicable for various purposes such as chemical detections, medical diagnostics, bio-sensing, and other low RI analytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ContinuumSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207