Highly sensitive double D-shaped channel photonic crystal fiber based plasmonic refractive index sensor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a highly sensitive miniaturized surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based photonic crystal fiber (PCF) sensor is presented for a wide range of analyte sensing. Gold is selected as the plasmonic metal for its higher chemical stability and titanium oxide works as the adhesive layer for gold attachment on silica. The plasmonic metal and the sensing medium are placed exterior to the surface of the sensor design to make it fitting for practical applications. By a careful arrangement of the periodic arrangement of the refractive index in the design, the generation of the evanescent fields is fine-tuned to obtain the phase matching between the leaky core guided mode and the surface plasmon polariton (SPP) mode. Numerical simulations have been carried out by employing the finite element method (FEM) with the consideration of a perfectly matched layer (PML) to absorb surface radiations. The proposed sensor shows a maximum wavelength sensitivity of 34,000 nm/RIU (refractive index units) and a maximum amplitude sensitivity of 331 RIU −1 , investigated by using the wavelength and the amplitude interrogation methods, respectively, for the analyte sensing range of 1.16 to 1.37 RI (refractive index). The sensor also exhibits a wavelength resolution of 2.94×10 −6 RIU which indicates a high detection accuracy. On that, the proposed sensor would be an excellent candidate for a wide range of RI detection, applicable for various purposes such as chemical detections, medical diagnostics, bio-sensing, and other low RI analytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it