MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220767203 · doi:10.21037/atm-22-998

Study on the effect of the ballistocardiography-based “Internet + Smart Bed” health management system on the quality of life of elderly users with chronic diseases

2022· article· en· W4220767203 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Translational Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technologies in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersScience and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province
KeywordsMedicineIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyHealth management systemHealth examinationGerontologyNursingAlternative medicineInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To study the effect of the "Internet + Smart Bed" health management system (IPBS) established with ballistocardiography (BCG) technology on the quality of life of elderly patients with chronic diseases. Methods: test and Bayesian methods were used to establish a generalized linear regression model to evaluate the effect of the IPBS on the quality of life of the subjects in the experiment. The control group (n=71) received routine examination and daily health risk management in pension facilities. Health service workers provided daily door-to-door care, and the users received regular diet, exercise, and medication supervision and guidance. The intervention group (n=79) was composed of users with chronic diseases, who accepted the IPBS. The health service workers, in addition to implementing routine examination and health risk management, conducted continuous monitoring and intervention management of the users' vital signs by means of the IPBS. Results: test analysis. After 15 months of follow-up in the intervention group, the rates of body function, emotion, behavior compliance (BC), and health knowledge (HK) awareness were 1.47 times, 1.75 times, 1.53 times, and 1.69 times higher than those in the control group, respectively. In the intervention group, after using the IPBS, all scores of quality of life were better than those before use, and the differences were statistically significant P=0 or P=0.1 (P<0.05). In the control group, there were no statistically significant differences before and after observation (P>0.05). Conclusions: Routine management in elderly users with chronic diseases by means of the IPBS, which could change the users' bad living habits and eating habits, raise the patients' HK awareness, and comprehensively improve the quality of life of patients with chronic diseases, is a self-health management model worthy of application and promotion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it