Seawater isotopic measurements (δ18O and δD) reveal significant freshwater influxes into the Arctic seas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the Arctic warms, one of the fundamental changes has been the freshening of Arctic ocean waters, impacting ocean circulation and marine ecosystems, among many other critical changes. This increase in freshwater is largely the result of increased precipitation and runoff as part of an amplified Arctic water cycle and increased influx of glacial meltwater from around the Arctic, particularly from the Greenland Ice Sheet. Tracing the sources and extent of this freshwater is critical to understanding future changes to the Arctic seas. One way of delineating these water masses is through measuring its isotopic composition (δ18O and δD), where the freshwater varies significantly from older and other ocean water sources. In order to identify these freshwater influxes, we conducted in-situ measurements aboard the USCGC Healy that transited the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, the Northwest Passage, and performed numerous transects across Baffin Bay and the Labrador Sea, including detailed examinations of several key fjords and coastal regions of Greenland, during autumn of 2021. Over the length of this 45 day expedition, we continuously measured the isotopic composition (δ18O and δD) of surface seawater allowing us to fingerprint these sources of freshwater and assess the spatial extent of their influence. We also collected discrete samples from over 100 CTD casts, primarily in Baffin Bay, to identify how freshwater is distributed in the ocean water column. Through these measurements, we identified numerous freshwater influxes, including anomalously high proportions of freshwater in sections of the Beaufort Sea north of Alaska and in Uummannaq Fjord along the west Greenland coast. These isotopic measurements also allow for the disentangling of different freshwater sources (i.e., precipitation or glacial meltwater). Additionally, we find that the freshwater pulses along the west coast of Greenland corresponded with relatively high levels of chlorophyll and fluorescence, suggesting a possible link between this increase in biologic productivity and an increase in the proportion of freshwater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".