MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220767974 · doi:10.46698/vnc.2022.16.9.003

THE NOTIONS OF ONE’S OWN AND OTHERS’ IN A NATIONAL CONTEXT

2022· article· ru· W4220767974 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Е.В. КАРСАНОВА

Bibliographic record

VenueKavkaz-forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalityEthnic groupContext (archaeology)IrishNational identityDramaPerceptionConversationQuarter (Canadian coin)Gender studiesMedia studiesSociologyHistoryPsychologyPolitical scienceLawLiteratureImmigrationPoliticsLinguisticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Большое значение при общении и построении отношений в любой сфере – академической, профессионально-трудовой, личной – имеют как личностные качества индивида, так и особенности мышления, поведения, различные установки и культурные приоритеты, обусловленные национально-этнической принадлежностью человека. Для каждой нации характерен определенный набор качеств, наиболее тесно ассоциирующихся с ней в представлении других народов и в ее собственном восприятии себя. Весьма интересной нацией в плане изучения различных аспектов национального менталитета являются англичане. В статье рассматриваются особенности восприятия англичанами первой четверти 20 века ‘себя’ и их отношение к ‘чужим’, то есть к представителям других национальностей, на основе диалогов и полилогов персонажей британского историко-драматического телесериала Downton Abbey (6 сезонов, 52 серии). В общей сложности проанализировано около 30 речевых отрывков, в которых фигурируют – чаще в разговоре, реже в качестве действующих лиц – представители следующих национальностей и упоминаются следующие страны: американцы / США, французы, Швейцария, Ирландия / ирландцы, Турция / турки, Россия / русские, евреи, Германия / немцы, итальянцы. К иностранцам отношение у англичан корректное, тактичное, но почти всегда, независимо от конкретной национальной принадлежности последних – снисходительное, с оттенком собственного превосходства. Для англичан характерно весьма почтительное, трепетное отношение ко всему, что олицетворяет их страну, связано с их историей, культурой, языком. Высокий уровень национального самосознания отмечается в работе как фактор, вытекающий из исторического прошлого страны, и необходимый для сохранения идентичности любой нации. Of great importance in communication and building relationships in any sphere – academic, vocational, or private – are both the individual’s personal qualities and the peculiarities of thinking and behaviour, as well as various attitudes and cultural priorities, stemming from the national and ethnic identity of a person. Each nation is characterized by a specific set of qualities that are most closely associated with them as perceived by other peoples and in their own self-perception. The English are a very interesting nation to explore various aspects of their national mentality. The article deals with the peculiarities of the English perception of 'themselves' in the first quarter of the 20th century and their attitude towards 'others', that is, to representatives of other nationalities. The research is based on the dialogues and polylogues of the characters of the British historical drama television series Downton Abbey (6 seasons, 52 episodes). In total, about 30 speech passages have been analyzed, in which representatives of the following nationalities appear – more frequently in conversation, less often as characters – and the following countries are mentioned: the Americans / the USA, the French, Switzerland, Ireland / the Irish, Turkey / the Turks, Russia / the Russians, the Jews, Germany / the Germans, the Italians. The British have a correct, tactful attitude towards foreigners, but most of the time, regardless of a particular nationality of the latters, it is condescending and superior. The English are characterized by a very respectful, reverent attitude towards everything that epitomizes their country and is connected with their history, culture, and language. A high level of national identity has been noted in the work as a factor arising from the historical past of the country, and the one required to preserve the identity of any nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.036
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKavkaz-forumSame topicRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsFrench-language works237,207