Brain Development and Maternal Behavior in Relation to Cognitive and Language Outcomes in Preterm-Born Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children born very preterm (≤32 weeks gestational age) show poorer cognitive and language development compared with their term-born peers. The importance of supportive maternal responses to the child's cues for promoting neurodevelopment is well established. However, little is known about whether supportive maternal behavior can buffer the association of early brain dysmaturation with cognitive and language performance. METHODS: Infants born very preterm (N = 226) were recruited from the neonatal intensive care unit for a prospective, observational cohort study. Chart review (e.g., size at birth, postnatal infection) was conducted from birth to discharge. Magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging, was acquired at approximately 32 weeks postmenstrual age and again at term-equivalent age. Fractional anisotropy, a quantitative measure of brain maturation, was obtained from 11 bilateral regions of interest in the cortical gray matter. At 3 years (n = 187), neurodevelopmental testing (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III) was administered, and parent-child interaction was filmed. Maternal behavior was scored using the Emotional Availability Scale-IV. A total of 146 infants with neonatal brain imaging and follow-up data were included for analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine whether maternal support interacted with mean fractional anisotropy values to predict Cognitive and Language scores at 3 years, accounting for confounding neonatal and maternal factors. RESULTS: Higher maternal support significantly moderated cortical fractional anisotropy values at term-equivalent age to predict higher Cognitive (interaction term β = 2.01, p = .05) and Language (interaction term β = 1.85, p = .04) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that supportive maternal behavior following early brain dysmaturation may provide an opportunity to promote optimal neurodevelopment in children born very preterm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".