MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220780144 · doi:10.1117/12.2616231

Probabilistic description of short-term cloud dynamics from rapid sampling of the solar spectral irradiance

2022· article· en· W4220780144 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nick Anderson, Viktar Tatsiankou, Karin Hinzer, Richard Beal, Henry Schriemer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsSpectra Energy (Canada)University of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrradianceSkyRemote sensingEnvironmental sciencePyranometerRadiometerMeteorologyComputer sciencePhysicsOpticsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar irradiance variability due to stochastic cloud dynamics can cause unwanted fluctuations in the output voltage of photovoltaic (PV) modules. These dynamics must in particular be understood at very-short and short time scales if grid interconnection and generation/load balance requirements are to be maintained for PV distributed across the grid edge. Using a recently-created database for Ottawa, Canada, a 6-month longitudinal study was conducted with a specific focus on cloud dynamics. A spectral pyranometer was used to derive full-range spectral and broadband global horizontal irradiance under all sky conditions every 250 ms. Exploiting the infrared (IR) measurement channel of this software-augmented multi-filter radiometer allowed the cloud dynamics to be probed across time scales ranging from the subsecond to minutes. Seven distinct sky conditions were self-consistently determined without sky imaging. Probability distributions, established via kernel density estimates (KDE), allowed the statistical dependence of these conditions on the spectral clear-sky index to be found. The stochastic nature of the spectral irradiance variability was probed using spectral clear-sky index increments, over time steps that were found to span three distinct variability regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207