MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220787459 · doi:10.3928/23258160-20220218-01

Pars Plana Vitrectomy Port Sizes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2022· review· en· W4220787459 on OpenAlexaff
Yuri V. Chaban, Marko M. Popovic, Anubhav Garg, Rajeev H. Muni, Peter J. Kertes

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsMuscular Dystrophy Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPars planaMedicineConfidence intervalRelative riskMeta-analysisVitrectomyRandomized controlled trialOphthalmologyVisual acuityClinical endpointSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The uptake of small-gauge (SG; ie, 23-gauge [23-G], 25-gauge [25-G], and 27-gauge [27-G]) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) has grown. We aim to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of various PPV port sizes in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for RCTs comparing PPV port sizes for any indication. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, and meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 1,678 eyes from 22 RCTs were included. Risk-of-bias assessment found some concerns in 13 studies. Compared with 20-gauge PPV, there was no significant difference in the final or change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; five studies analyzed each) relative to that of SG PPV. SG PPV was associated with a significantly greater incidence of hypotony ( RR = 3.79; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 2.02 to 7.10; P < .0001; six studies) and choroidal detachment ( RR = 5.65; 95% CI, 1.01 to 31.71; P = .05; three studies). Compared with 25-G PPV, there was no significant difference in BCVA at any time point with 23-G (two studies), and significantly more frequent port suturing was required with 23-G ( RR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.84; P = .01; two studies). Compared with 25-G PPV, 27-G was associated with a significantly better final BCVA (WMD = −0.06 logMAR; 95% CI, −0.11 to −0.01; P = .02; five studies) and a significantly lengthened surgery (W MD = 4.11 minutes; 95% CI, 0.18 to 8.05; P = .04; three studies). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in visual or surgical outcomes following 20-gauge PPV relative to SG PPV (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation recommendation: low certainty), and there was an increased risk of postoperative complications with SG PPV (moderate certainty). Compared with 25-G PPV, 23-G required more frequent port suturing (moderate certainty), whereas 27-G may be associated with a better final BCVA but longer surgery (low and moderate certainty, respectively). [ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:152–158.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.051
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0510.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.1080.106
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retinaSame topicRetinal and Macular SurgeryFrench-language works237,207