MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220811308 · doi:10.1785/0220220019

LOC-FLOW: An End-to-End Machine Learning-Based High-Precision Earthquake Location Workflow

2022· article· en· W4220811308 on OpenAlexaff
Miao Zhang, Min Liu, Tian Feng, Ruijia Wang, Weiqiang Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeismological Research Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarthquake locationWorkflowComputer scienceRelocationGeneralizationFlow (mathematics)Sequence (biology)SeismologyInduced seismicityGeologyReal-time computingDatabaseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ever-increasing networks and quantity of seismic data drive the need for seamless and automatic workflows for rapid and accurate earthquake detection and location. In recent years, machine learning (ML)-based pickers have achieved remarkable accuracy and efficiency with generalization, and thus can significantly improve the earthquake location accuracy of previously developed sequential location methods. However, the inconsistent input or output (I/O) formats between multiple packages often limit their cross application. To reduce format barriers, we incorporated a widely used ML phase picker—PhaseNet—with several popular earthquake location methods and developed a “hands-free” end-to-end ML-based location workflow (named LOC-FLOW), which can be applied directly to continuous waveforms and build high-precision earthquake catalogs at local and regional scales. The renovated open-source package assembles several sequential algorithms including seismic first-arrival picking (PhaseNet and STA/LTA), phase association (REAL), absolute location (VELEST and HYPOINVERSE), and double-difference relative location (hypoDD and GrowClust). We provided different location strategies and I/O interfaces for format conversion to form a seamless earthquake location workflow. Different algorithms can be flexibly selected and/or combined. As an example, we apply LOC-FLOW to the 28 September 2004 Mw 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake sequence. LOC-FLOW accomplished seismic phase picking, association, velocity model updating, station correction, absolute location, and double-difference relocation for 16-day continuous seismic data. We detected and located 3.7 times (i.e., 4357) as many as earthquakes with cross-correlation double-difference locations from the Northern California Earthquake Data Center. Our study demonstrates that LOC-FLOW is capable of building high-precision earthquake catalogs efficiently and seamlessly from continuous seismic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations161
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeismological Research LettersSame topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207