MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220811308 · doi:10.1785/0220220019

LOC-FLOW: An End-to-End Machine Learning-Based High-Precision Earthquake Location Workflow

2022· article· en· W4220811308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeismological Research Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarthquake locationWorkflowComputer scienceRelocationGeneralizationFlow (mathematics)Sequence (biology)SeismologyInduced seismicityGeologyReal-time computingDatabaseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ever-increasing networks and quantity of seismic data drive the need for seamless and automatic workflows for rapid and accurate earthquake detection and location. In recent years, machine learning (ML)-based pickers have achieved remarkable accuracy and efficiency with generalization, and thus can significantly improve the earthquake location accuracy of previously developed sequential location methods. However, the inconsistent input or output (I/O) formats between multiple packages often limit their cross application. To reduce format barriers, we incorporated a widely used ML phase picker—PhaseNet—with several popular earthquake location methods and developed a “hands-free” end-to-end ML-based location workflow (named LOC-FLOW), which can be applied directly to continuous waveforms and build high-precision earthquake catalogs at local and regional scales. The renovated open-source package assembles several sequential algorithms including seismic first-arrival picking (PhaseNet and STA/LTA), phase association (REAL), absolute location (VELEST and HYPOINVERSE), and double-difference relative location (hypoDD and GrowClust). We provided different location strategies and I/O interfaces for format conversion to form a seamless earthquake location workflow. Different algorithms can be flexibly selected and/or combined. As an example, we apply LOC-FLOW to the 28 September 2004 Mw 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake sequence. LOC-FLOW accomplished seismic phase picking, association, velocity model updating, station correction, absolute location, and double-difference relocation for 16-day continuous seismic data. We detected and located 3.7 times (i.e., 4357) as many as earthquakes with cross-correlation double-difference locations from the Northern California Earthquake Data Center. Our study demonstrates that LOC-FLOW is capable of building high-precision earthquake catalogs efficiently and seamlessly from continuous seismic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it