MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220818294 · doi:10.5194/acp-2021-965-ac1

Response to all comments of reviewers

2022· peer-review· en· W4220818294 on OpenAlexaff
Chong Han

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOxAerosolAtmosphere (unit)ParticulatesEnvironmental chemistryYield (engineering)ChemistrySulfateMeteorologyOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceCombustionMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) are active ingredients in widely used consumer products, which can volatilize into the atmosphere, thus attracting much attention due to their potential environmental risks. While in the atmosphere the cVMS undergo oxidation yielding both gaseous and particulate products. The aerosol yields and compositions from the OH oxidation of four cVMS (D3-D6) were determined under low and high-NOx conditions in an oxidation flow reactor. The aerosol yields progressively increased from D3 to D6, consistent with the volatilities and molecule weights of these cVMS. NOx can restrict the formation of SOA, leading to lower SOA yields under high-NOx conditions than under low-NOx conditions, with a yield decrease between 0.05–0.30 depending on the cVMS. Ammonium sulfate seeds exhibited minor impacts on SOA yields under low-NOx conditions, but significantly increased the SOA yields in the oxidation of D3-D5 at short photochemical ages under high-NOx conditions. The mass spectra of the SOA showed a dependence of its chemical compositions on OH exposure. At high exposures, equivalent to photochemical ages of > 6 days in the atmosphere, D4-D6 SOA mainly consisted of CxHy and CxHyOzSin under low-NOx conditions, whereas they primarily contained NmOz, CxHy, CxHyO1, CxHyO>1 and CxHyOzSin under high-NOx conditions. Using the yield data from the present study and reported cVMS annual production, a global cVMS-derived SOA source strength is estimated to be 0.16 Tg yr−1, distributed over major urban centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.187
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.187
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0090.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1780.108

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207