Integrating whole genome sequencing, methylation, gene expression, topologically associated domain information in regulatory mutation prediction: A study of follicular lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A major challenge in human genetics is of the analysis of the interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors in a multifactorial disease like cancer. Here, a novel methodology is proposed to investigate genome-wide regulatory mechanisms in cancer, as studied with the example of follicular Lymphoma (FL). In a first phase, a new machine-learning method is designed to identify Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs) by computing six attributes. In a second phase, an integrative data analysis method is developed to study regulatory mutations in FL, by considering differential methylation information together with DNA sequence variation, differential gene expression, 3D organization of genome (e.g., topologically associated domains), and enriched biological pathways. Resulting mutation block-gene pairs are further ranked to find out the significant ones. By this approach, BCL2 and BCL6 were identified as top-ranking FL-related genes with several mutation blocks and DMRs acting on their regulatory regions. Two additional genes, CDCA4 and CTSO, were also found in top rank with significant DNA sequence variation and differential methylation in neighboring areas, pointing towards their potential use as biomarkers for FL. This work combines both genomic and epigenomic information to investigate genome-wide gene regulatory mechanisms in cancer and contribute to devising novel treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".