Optimal Design of Intelligent Control System in the Communication Room Based on Artificial Intelligence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the current data‐driven era, there is the potential to employ controllers that can store a large amount of data, which is not achievable with traditional controllers. Our goal is to propose an intelligent controller system for computer room management based on artificial intelligence that maintains data integrity, saves memory, minimizes computation, and simplifies program design. To upgrade the computer room management system’s intelligence that is not high, the management mode that is not flexible, and the distributed large‐scale management of the whole school that is difficult to realize, the original system is improved to the distributed computer room management system based on artificial intelligence. By starting from the actual situation of higher vocational college computer room, combined with the characteristics of the school computer room, we designed framework model based on distributed artificial intelligence machine room management system, the system by means of network communication technology and database access technology, put forward the B/S combined with C/S structure to realize the computer room management system model, and used radio frequency identification technology to develop radio frequency card. The results show that the optimization results of the traditional computer automatic control system in the computer room vary greatly and fluctuate between 0.6 and 0.8, while the control results of the automatic control system in this paper keep stable at 0.8, which can reach the ideal state in a short time. Through the outcome, it can be said that the proposed control method can be used of higher level of automation, flexibility, and robustness which will work effectively. Therefore, the improved system integrates software, hardware, communication, and distributed system technology into one, which greatly improves the control effect of computer automatic control process, and control result of computer automatic control process is more stable and has a certain practical application value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".