Energy-Aware Hybrid RF-VLC Multiband Selection in D2D Communication: A Stochastic Multiarmed Bandit Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To handle the exponentially growing service expectations from mobile users and circumvent the band switching slow rate, device-to-device (D2D) communication is receiving much research attention in the Internet of Things (IoT). While the emerging D2D nodes can support heterogeneous frequency bands [radio frequency (RF) including 2.4 GHz/5 GHz wireless local area network (WLAN), 38-GHz millimeter wave (mmWave), and visible light communication (VLC)], the physical constraints (e.g., blocking) require the user devices to dynamically switch between the bands in order to avoid the loss of connectivity and throughput degradation. In this article, we investigate an effective online link selection in hybrid RF-VLC scenarios for direct user data handling. First, we model the multiband selection issue as a multiarmed bandit (MAB) problem. The source/relay node acts as a player who gambles to maximize its long-term feedback/reward via selecting suitable arms, i.e., available bands (WLAN, mmWave, or VLC). Then, we propose an online, energy-aware band selection (EABS) methodology by leveraging three theoretically guaranteed MAB techniques [upper confidence bound (UCB), Thompson sampling (TS), and minimax optimal stochastic strategy (MOSS)] to derive optimal band selection policies. Based on these adopted policies, we propose three algorithms, namely, EABS-UCB, EABS-TS, and EABS-MOSS, to implement the EABS strategy, respectively. Extensive simulations demonstrate our proposed algorithms’ superior performance compared to the traditional link selection schemes regarding energy efficiency, average throughput, and convergence rate. In particular, EABS-MOSS emerges as the best algorithm as it exhibits near-optimal performance due to its flexibility to both stochastic and adversarial environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".