MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220860717 · doi:10.5539/ies.v15n2p191

Problems Experienced by Science and Art Center Teachers in the Project Consultancy Process and Suggestions for Solutions: A Phenomenological Research

2022· article· en· W4220860717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Education Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Leadership and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchPsychologyCase study researchResearch designSampling (signal processing)Data collectionContent analysisResearch methodProcess (computing)Probability samplingMedical educationDescriptive statisticsDescriptive researchSociologyManagement scienceEngineeringComputer scienceSocial scienceMathematicsBusinessMedicineStatisticsBusiness administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, the problems experienced by the teachers in Science and Art Centers (BILSEM) during their consultancy processes of projects and the suggestions for these problems were examined. 15 teachers working in Nuray Tuncay Kara and Şahinbey Municipality BILSEMs Gaziantep Province participated in this study, which was designed in the qualitative research method and case study pattern. Criterion sampling, maximum variation sampling and easily accessible sampling were used together to determine the participants of the study. The research data were gathered with a semi-structured interview form prepared by the research group and the gathered data were analyzed through content analysis and descriptive analysis. According to the results of the research, a significant part of the participants stated that the project consultancy process provides maximum job satisfaction, that financial and cooperation problems are experienced mostly in the process in which colleague support is important in solving the problems, that a budget for projects should be planned. The findings of the research were discussed regarding the relevant literature and some suggestions were made based on the research results.In this research, the problems experienced by the teachers in Science and Art Centers (BILSEM) during their consultancy processes of projects and the suggestions for these problems were examined. 15 teachers working in Nuray Tuncay Kara and Şahinbey Municipality BILSEMs Gaziantep Province participated in this study, which was designed in the qualitative research method and case study pattern. Criterion sampling, maximum variation sampling and easily accessible sampling were used together to determine the participants of the study. The research data were gathered with a semi-structured interview form prepared by the research group and the gathered data were analyzed through content analysis and descriptive analysis. According to the results of the research, a significant part of the participants stated that the project consultancy process provides maximum job satisfaction, that financial and cooperation problems are experienced mostly in the process in which colleague support is important in solving the problems, that a budget for projects should be planned. The findings of the research were discussed regarding the relevant literature and some suggestions were made based on the research results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.365
GPT teacher head0.554
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it