MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220861406 · doi:10.1002/marc.202200063

Electrospun Azo‐Cellulose Fabric: A Smart Polysaccharidic Photo‐Actuator

2022· article· en· W4220861406 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Ahmadi-Nohadani, Steve Nono-Tagne, Christopher J. Barrett, Issei Otsuka

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersInstitut Carnot PolyNat
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanofiberPolymerElectrospinningChemical engineeringSpiropyranAcetoneSolventPolymer chemistryDimethylacetamideCelluloseAzobenzeneComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A natural polysaccharide-based smart photo-actuator is fabricated via electrospinning of cellulose 4-phenyl azobenzoate (Azo-Cel) from its organic solution in a mixture of high-volatile acetone, a poor solvent of Azo-Cel, and low-volatile N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc), a good solvent of Azo-Cel. At an optimal polymer concentration (17 wt%) and solvent mixing ratio (acetone/DMAc = 3/2 (v/v)), stable electrified polymer jets are formed and continuous nanofibers and their nonwoven fabric can be drawn on a cylinder-shaped rotating drum electrode under a high electric field (25 kV). Scanning electron microscopic observation of the Azo-Cel fabric confirms that the fabric consists of uniaxially aligned nanofibers with a mean diameter of 207 nm. The water contact angle of the Azo-Cel fabric reversibly decreases and increases in response to alternate irradiation with UV and visible light to induce geometric deformation of the azobenzene moiety between the trans and cis isomers, which lead to lower and higher surface free energies, respectively. In addition, self-standing Azo-Cel fabric exhibits a UV-driven photo-mechanical asymmetric bending deformation toward the light source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Rapid CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207