MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220861858 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-11278

Michigan International Copper Analogue (MICA) project – assessment of long-term behaviour of copper in repository relevant environments

2022· preprint· en· W4220861858 on OpenAlexaffabout
Axel Liebscher, Heini Reijonen, Ismo Aaltonen, Xuan Liu, Christina Lilja, Simon Norris, Lindsay Waffle, Peter Keech, Nikitas Diomidis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSafety caseRadioactive wasteCopperEnvironmental scienceNuclear decommissioningWaste managementEngineeringRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the key requirements for the deep geological disposal of high-level nuclear waste is the assessment of its long-term performance and safety. As any other barrier of the disposal system, waste containers must fulfil their respective safety functions for the required duration, which can vary from a few hundreds of years to several hundreds of thousands of years, depending on disposal system requirements. Sufficient corrosion resistance under repository conditions is one key requirement for container material to provide complete waste containment. Copper is an important part of many waste packaging and disposal concepts, e.g. KBS-3 developed in Sweden and Finland and Mark II developed in Canada. Much of the data available regarding its behaviour under repository conditions comes from short-term investigations, such as laboratory experiments at different scales and under controlled conditions. Observations made from copper analogue studies provide additional information on copper behaviour during the assessment time scale and under real geological environments. By this, they can support the argumentation in the safety case. Keweenaw native copper occurrences (Lake Superior, US) reflects more than one billion years of deposit evolution covering various geological (from bedrock to sediments and even anthropogenic mine site remnants) and geochemical environments (e.g., brines to meteoric water, anoxic vs. oxic, sulphur-free vs. sulphur-bearing). These deposits have been mined for a long time and there is a great deal of knowledge related to them as well as samples collected. However, data to be used in process based safety assessments for geological disposal is lacking and no formal review has been made from the geological disposal point of view. The current MICA Project Phase I systematically collect and review the existing literature and data on the Michigan copper analogue sites and available sampling potential. Based on the outcome, MICA Project Phase II will then study and analyse prospective sites and samples to address relevant questions regarding long-term behaviour of copper under disposal conditions. The MICA Project thus will provide a unique complementary data source to estimate processes governing behaviour of metallic copper and to support safety cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207