MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220864256 · doi:10.2166/wst.2022.095

An essential tool for WRRF modelling: a realistic and complete influent generator for flow rate and water quality based on data-driven methods

2022· article· en· W4220864256 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Science & Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentrEau - Quebec Water Management Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenerator (circuit theory)Water qualityRange (aeronautics)InletAutomationData miningComputer scienceMultivariate statisticsVolumetric flow rateArtificial neural networkEngineeringEnvironmental scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modelling, automation, and control are widely used for water resource recovery facility (WRRF) optimization. An influent generator (IG) is a model, aiming to provide the flowrate and pollutant concentration dynamics at the inlet of a WRRF for a range of modelling applications. In this study, a new data-driven IG model is proposed, only using routine data and weather information, and without need for any additional data collection. The model is constructed by an artificial neural network (ANN) and completed with a multivariate regression to generate time series for certain pollutants. The model is able to generate flowrate and quality data (TSS, COD, and nutrients) at different time scales and resolutions (daily or hourly), depending on various user objectives. The model performance is analyzed by a series of statistical criteria. It is shown that the model can generate a very reliable dataset for different model applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it