Structural bases of T cell antigen receptor recognition in celiac disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Celiac disease (CeD) is a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-linked autoimmune-like disorder that is triggered by the ingestion of gluten or related storage proteins. The majority of CeD patients are HLA-DQ2.5+, with the remainder being either HLA-DQ8+ or HLA-DQ2.2+. Structural studies have shown how deamidation of gluten epitopes engenders binding to HLA-DQ2.5/8, which then triggers an aberrant CD4+ T cell response. HLA tetramer studies, combined with structural investigations, have demonstrated that repeated patterns of TCR usage underpins the immune response to some HLADQ2.5/8 restricted gluten epitopes, with distinct TCR motifs representing common landing pads atop the HLA–gluten complexes. Structural studies have provided insight into TCR specificity and cross-reactivity towards gluten epitopes, as well as cross-reactivity to bacterial homologues of gluten epitopes, suggesting that environmental factors may directly play a role in CeD pathogenesis. Collectively, structural immunology-based studies in the CeD axis may lead to new therapeutics/diagnostics to treat CeD, and also serve as an exemplar for other T cell mediated autoimmune diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".