Syphilis in pregnancy and infant outcomes in Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Infectious syphilis has been increasing in incidence in Manitoba since 2012, especially in heterosexual women of childbearing age resulting in an increasing number of infants with in utero exposure and who are at risk for congenital syphilis (CS). We aimed to evaluate the impact of syphilis in pregnancy on infants and to describe our experience with CS. Methodology: This retrospective 2012 to 2018 cohort study reviewed women with syphilis in pregnancy and short-term infant outcomes. We grouped mother-infant pairs into high risk and low risk for CS and compared their management and outcomes. We also describe our cases of confirmed and possible CS. Results: Seventy-nine mothers and 80 infants met inclusion criteria. Thirty mother-infant pairs were classified as high risk for CS. Nine of their infants were diagnosed with confirmed CS and four with possible CS. All confirmed CS cases were asymptomatic at birth but two were not recognized to have CS until they later presented with symptoms. One of these infants had negative serologies (treponemal and non-treponemal) at birth, but at 3 months old had reactive serologies. Two months of age was the earliest clearance of maternal treponemal antibodies amongst low-risk infants compared to 6 months in high-risk infants. Most infants who did not have confirmed CS had non-reactive non-treponemal tests by 6 months old. Interpretation: Our study shows that symptoms and paired maternal-infant non-treponemal titres at birth are not sensitive for diagnosing CS. Serologies can be falsely negative with recent infection. Regardless of investigations or clinical findings, 10 days of intravenous penicillin G should be considered for all high-risk infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".