MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220877412 · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.819172

Modulation of ERCC1-XPF Heterodimerization Inhibition via Structural Modification of Small Molecule Inhibitor Side-Chains

2022· article· en· W4220877412 on OpenAlexafffund
Claudia Weilbeer, David Jay, James C. Donnelly, Francesco Gentile, Feridoun Karimi‐Busheri, Xiaoyan Yang, Rajam S. Mani, Yaping Yu, Ahmed H. Elmenoufy, Khaled Barakat, Jack A. Tuszyński, Michael Weinfeld, F. G. West

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesNovartis Pharmaceuticals CanadaAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsERCC1EndonucleaseNucleotide excision repairIn silicoDNADNA repairChemistryIn vitroDNA damageSmall moleculeCell biologyBiochemistryBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inhibition of DNA repair enzymes is an attractive target for increasing the efficacy of DNA damaging chemotherapies. The ERCC1-XPF heterodimer is a key endonuclease in numerous single and double strand break repair processes, and inhibition of the heterodimerization has previously been shown to sensitize cancer cells to DNA damage. In this work, the previously reported ERCC1-XPF inhibitor 4 was used as the starting point for an in silico study of further modifications of the piperazine side-chain. A selection of the best scoring hits from the in silico screen were synthesized using a late stage functionalization strategy which should allow for further iterations of this class of inhibitors to be readily synthesized. Of the synthesized compounds, compound 6 performed the best in the in vitro fluorescence based endonuclease assay. The success of compound 6 in inhibiting ERCC1-XPF endonuclease activity in vitro translated well to cell-based assays investigating the inhibition of nucleotide excision repair and disruption of heterodimerization. Subsequently compound 6 was shown to sensitize HCT-116 cancer cells to treatment with UVC, cyclophosphamide, and ionizing radiation. This work serves as an important step towards the synergistic use of DNA repair inhibitors with chemotherapeutic drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in OncologySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207