Urinary Potassium Excretion and Progression From Advanced CKD to Kidney Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Increased dietary potassium intake has well-proven beneficial effects on cardiovascular health and mortality. However, the association between dietary potassium intake and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression remains unclear with prior studies reporting conflicting results. Objective: To study the association between 24-hour urinary potassium excretion (a surrogate for dietary potassium intake) and progression to kidney failure. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Ottawa, Canada Patients: Patients with advanced CKD referred to the Ottawa Hospital Multi-Care Kidney Clinic from 2010 to 2020. Measurements: Twenty-four-hour urinary potassium excretion measured upon referral to the Ottawa Hospital Multi-Care Kidney Clinic as part of routine clinic protocol. Methods: Multivariable Cox and Fine and Gray models provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the association between quartiles of 24-hour urinary potassium excretion and progression to kidney failure. A restricted cubic spline analysis examined the possible nonlinear relationship between 24-hour urinary potassium excretion (as a continuous variable) and progression to kidney failure. Results: Overall, 432/695 (62%) patients progressed to kidney failure. Across all models, there was no significant difference in kidney failure risk by quartile of 24-hour urinary potassium excretion (all P values for trend ≥.05). Hazard ratios (95% CIs) from the multivariable-adjusted Cox model were as follows: quartile 1, referent; quartile 2, 0.95 (0.71-1.27); quartile 3, 1.00 (0.76-1.33); and quartile 4 0.85 (0.63-1.14); P value for trend = .36. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed an overall linear and nonsignificant relationship between 24-hour urinary potassium excretion as a continuous variable and progression to kidney failure. Limitations: Observational design, single center. Conclusions: We found no association between 24-hour urinary potassium excretion and progression to kidney failure in patients with advanced CKD. Therefore, we identified no clear evidence that increasing or decreasing dietary potassium intake significantly associates with CKD progression in this population. Trial Registration: Not registered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".