A new cosmological model based on quantization of the zero-point field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflation has presented solutions for a number of important cosmological problems while leaving some unanswered. In this paper, we present a new cosmological model based on the quantization of the zero-point field, which is consistent with empirical data, requires fewer assumptions, and presents answers to some of those unanswered questions. A comparison between standard cosmology and the theory presented in this paper is given herein. Vacuum energy density: The standard inflationary model needs both Hubble’s constant and matter density to estimate the vacuum energy density, but new cosmological model needs only Hubble’s constant. Non-vacuum energy density: The standard model cannot predict the non-vacuum energy density, but the new model can predict it using only Hubble’s constant. Ratio of vacuum energy to total energy: The standard model cannot predict the ratio of vacuum energy to total energy, but the new model can predict it, without using Hubble’s constant. Energy conservation: In the standard model, total energy is not conserved before inflation and at the time of the creation of the universe, but in the new model total energy is mathematically proved to be conserved from the beginning of the universe as net energy (including gravitational potential energy) is always zero. Flatness and homogeneity: The standard model requires an inflaton field with a specific potential energy distribution to explain it, but the new model does not need any such hypothetical field; the zero-point field is sufficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".