DMPC/Chol liposomal copper CX5461 is therapeutically superior to a DSPC/Chol formulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CX5461, a compound initially identified as an RNA polymerase inhibitor and more recently as a G-quadruplex binder, binds copper to form a complex. Our previous publication showed that the complexation reaction can be leveraged to formulate copper-CX5461 inside liposomes, improving the apparent solubility of CX5461 by over 500-fold and reducing the elimination of CX5461 from the plasma compartment following intravenous administration. In mouse models of acute myeloid leukemia, the resulting formulation was more effective than the free drug solution of CX5461 (pH 3.5) currently used in clinical trials. However, the gains observed with the liposomal formulation were minimal, despite significant increases in circulation half-life. Since the formulation technology used relied on liposomes and the fate of most compounds associated with liposomes is dependent on liposomal lipid composition, the studies described here were designed to evaluate how simple changes in lipid composition could affect therapeutic activity. The previously reported formulation method was simplified to ensure an easy scale-up process. In the modified method, pre-measured solid CX5461 was added to copper-containing liposomes prior to an incubation at 60 °C, which enabled copper-CX5461 complexation inside DSPC/Chol or DMPC/Chol liposomes. Efficacy was determined in BRCA-normal (BxPC3) and BRCA-deficient (Capan-1) models of pancreatic cancer. Both liposomal formulations enhanced the circulation lifetime of CX5461 compared to the free drug solution (pH 3.5). Unlike most compounds that are loaded using a transmembrane pH-gradient, the dissociation of CX5461 from liposomes prepared using the copper complexation method were comparable for DSPC/Chol and DMPC/Chol liposomes, in vitro and in vivo. Nonetheless, copper CX5461 prepared using DMPC/Chol liposomes exhibited superior efficacy. The reason for the improved activity of DMPC/Chol copper-CX5461 was not readily explained by the release data and may be due to the fact that DMPC/Chol liposomes are less stable following localization in the tumor. The results indicate that the therapeutic effects of copper-CX5461 will be dependent on liposomal lipid composition and that liposomal CX5461 should exhibit superior benefits when used to treat BRCA-deficient cancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".