MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220918771 · doi:10.1161/jaha.121.023572

Use of Photovoice to Explore Pediatric Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and their Parents' Perceptions of a Heart‐Healthy Lifestyle

2022· article· en· W4220918771 on OpenAlexaffabout
Frances Sobierajski, Kate Storey, Melissa Bird, Samantha J. Anthony, Sarah J. Pol, Tara Pidborochynski, Diana Balmer‐Minnes, Alliya Remtulla Tharani, Alyssa Power, Michael Khoury, Chentel Cunningham, Aamir Jeewa, Jennifer Conway

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationStollery Children's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFeelingThematic analysisPhotovoicePsychological interventionQualitative researchGerontologyPsychiatryPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Heart-healthy lifestyles promote lifelong cardiovascular health. However, patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are often advised to avoid strenuous exercise because of the risk of sudden cardiac death. Given these restrictions, this study explored youth and parent perceptions of a heart-healthy lifestyle and the barriers and facilitators to this lifestyle. Methods and Results Youth and parents were purposefully recruited at 2 Canadian hospitals for this photovoice project. Participants were given cameras and took pictures of everyday heart-healthy or heart-unhealthy choices. Photos were discussed during one-on-one qualitative interviews with youth and parents separately to understand the photos' meaning and significance. Inductive descriptive thematic analysis was employed. A total of 16 youth (median age, 14.4 years [range, 10.5-17.7 years]; 63% boys) and 16 parents (100% women) participated. A total of 15 youth were activity restricted. Data analysis revealed 7 categories organized into perceptions of healthy living (health is holistic and individualized) and factors influencing engagement in healthy living (self-awareness, ownership and autonomy, feeling restricted and peer pressure, support from parents, and support from the cardiologist). Participants had a complex understanding of health and discussed the importance of physical, mental, and social well-being. Youth used self-awareness and taking responsibility as facilitators of healthy living. Healthy living was shaped by peers, parent role-modeling, and cardiologist recommendations. Conclusions This study depicts the realities for youth with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and can be used to inform the development of responsive interventions. Holistic, patient-specific interventions may be more successful, and strategies such as shared decision making may be important to promote self-awareness and autonomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart AssociationSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207