Chromosome number, heterochromatin, and genome size support recent polyploid origin of the <i>Epidendrum nocturnum</i> group and reveal a new species (Laeliinae, Orchidaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Epidendrum nocturnum Jacq. group comprises about 60 species. Nine species occur in Brazil, predominantly in the Atlantic and Amazon Forests. The group is taxonomically complex because its species are morphologically similar and not easily distinguished. The main objective of this work is to characterize their chromosome evolution and how this has affected species delimitation in Brazilian representatives of the E. nocturnum group. We used chromosome numbers, heterochromatin band patterns, and genome size variation to better understand the chromosome variation, species delimitation, and the relationship among seven representatives of this group. A new species from the Cerrado/Amazon Rainforest ecotone is described based on cytological and morphological characters. The new species, Epidendrum pareciense sp. nov., is a diploid (2n = 40), Epidendrum bahiense Rchb.f., Epidendrum carpophorum Barb.Rodr., Epidendrum micronocturnum Carnevali & G.A.Romero, Epidendrum purpureocaulis Sambin & Essers, and E. nocturnum are tetraploids (2n = 80), and Epidendrum tumuc-humaciense (Veyret) Carnevali & G.A.Romero is hexaploid (2n = 120), the last a new ploidy for the group. Heterochromatin in these species is characterized by guanine-cytosine-rich regions (cromomycin A3 (CMA + ) bands) on proximal and terminal regions associated with NORs. Genome size and numbers of CMA terminal bands are directly related to ploidy, suggesting that diploidization has not yet occurred and supporting the hypothesis of a recent polyploid origin for the E. nocturnum group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".