Research on the Prediction of the Operational Risk Field of Intelligent Vehicles Based on Dual Multiline LiDAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To effectively evaluate the risk situation between intelligent vehicles and surrounding traffic participants in complex scenes, a complex traffic environment perception technology based on dual multiline light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is proposed in this work. The vehicle motion state is predicted by fusing the multiview characteristics of point cloud timing and multitarget interaction information, and the risk assessment model is constructed via artificial potential field theory. The real-time point cloud information is used to obtain the time-sequence bird’s-eye view and range image. The improved VGG19 network model is used to extract the time-sequence high-level abstract combined features in the multiview scene. The constructed time-sequence feature vector is used as the input data of the attention mechanism, and the attention-bidirectional long short-term memory (Attention-BiLSTM) model is used for training to form the desired input-output mapping relationship. The motion state of the target vehicle can therefore be updated, and the static and dynamic risk fields of traffic participants surrounding the vehicle can be established based on artificial potential field theory, thereby allowing for the evaluation of the operational risk of the intelligent vehicle. The results of experiments demonstrate that the prediction effect of the target vehicle state parameters via the use of the proposed model is better than that of other compared models, and the prediction effect of the risk field of intelligent vehicle operation based on the multiview point cloud features and vehicle interaction information is good.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".