MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220938751 · doi:10.1096/fj.202100901rrr

Role of cellular retinol‐binding protein, type 1 and retinoid homeostasis in the adult mouse heart: A multi‐omic approach

2022· article· en· W4220938751 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Zalesak‐Kravec, Weiliang Huang, Jace W. Jones, Jianshi Yu, Jenna Alloush, Amy Defnet, Alexander R. Moise, Maureen A. Kane

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsHomeostasisBiologyRetinoic acidRetinoidMetaboliteProteomeTranscriptomeMetabolomicsCell biologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryBioinformaticsGene expressionMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The main active metabolite of Vitamin A, all ‐ trans retinoic acid (RA), is required for proper cellular function and tissue organization. Heart development has a well‐defined requirement for RA, but there is limited research on the role of RA in the adult heart. Homeostasis of RA includes regulation of membrane receptors, chaperones, enzymes, and nuclear receptors. Cellular retinol‐binding protein, type 1 (CRBP1), encoded by retinol‐binding protein, type 1 ( Rbp1 ), regulates RA homeostasis by delivering vitamin A to enzymes for RA synthesis and protecting it from non‐specific oxidation. In this work, a multi‐omics approach was used to characterize the effect of CRBP1 loss using the Rbp1 −/− mouse. Retinoid homeostasis was disrupted in Rbp1 −/− mouse heart tissue, as seen by a 33% and 24% decrease in RA levels in the left and right ventricles, respectively, compared to wild‐type mice (WT). To further inform on the effect of disrupted RA homeostasis, we conducted high‐throughput targeted metabolomics. A total of 222 metabolite and metabolite combinations were analyzed, with 33 having differential abundance between Rbp1 −/− and WT hearts. Additionally, we performed global proteome profiling to further characterize the impact of CRBP1 loss in adult mouse hearts. More than 2606 unique proteins were identified, with 340 proteins having differential expression between Rbp1 −/− and WT hearts. Pathway analysis performed on metabolomic and proteomic data revealed pathways related to cellular metabolism and cardiac metabolism were the most disrupted in Rbp1 −/− mice. Together, these studies characterize the effect of CRBP1 loss and reduced RA in the adult heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207