MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220941294 · doi:10.5206/uwomj.v90i1.13932

Variant Mixed-Type Inguinal Hernia: A Cadaveric Case Report

2022· article· en· W4220941294 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Danit Freedman, A Friesen, Hecham Omar, Dalton Ruel, Ziad Sabaa-Ayoun, Zachary Weiss, Charys M. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Western Ontario Medical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermatic cordMedicineScrotumHerniaAbdominal wallCadaveric spasmAnatomyInguinal herniaDissection (medical)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During cadaveric dissection of an 84-year-old male, a previously undocumented mixed-type (direct/indirect) inguinal hernia was found within the spermatic cord. Unlike typical indirect hernias, it did not originate from the deep inguinal ring. Instead, the hernia penetrated the abdominal wall medial to the inferior epigastric vessels, through the wall of the spermatic cord, and continued distally into the scrotum within the spermatic cord. The hernia consisted of a peritoneal sac containing compressed omental tissue. This sac protruded through a weakening in the abdominal wall and into the spermatic cord, but not beyond the superficial ring. The hernia observed presents with characteristics of both direct and indirect inguinal hernias. Consequently, it cannot be classified in the traditional way. This appears to be the first reported instance of this type of hernia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Western Ontario Medical JournalSame topicHernia repair and managementFrench-language works237,207