MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220967992 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/irac012.178

550 Considerations for Ophthalmologic Evaluation to Reduce Ocular Morbidity in Facial Burn Patients

2022· article· en· W4220967992 on OpenAlexaff
Keith Sweitzer, Jessica Forman, Derek Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Trauma and Fracture Management
Canadian institutionsTD Bank Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemosisOdds ratioEyelidRetrospective cohort studyBurn centerBurn injuryFacial traumaSurgeryPoison controlEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Advances in burn management have led to significant improvement in survival rates, even in patients with high total body surface area (TBSA) affected. Ocular morbidity in facial burn patients remains high, partially attributable to the life-threatening nature of these injuries. Previous studies have shown that early ophthalmologic intervention leads to better outcomes, however, specific risk factors for short and longer term ophthalmologic outcomes have not been elucidated. This study aimed to identify risk factors for short- and long-term ophthalmologic complications in facial burn patients to prioritize patients that require urgent ophthalmologic evaluation. Methods Retrospective review of facial burn patients presenting to an American Burn Association-verified regional burn center between June 2007 and May 2016 was conducted. Demographics, presentation, time to ophthalmologic consultation, and short- and long-term complications were recorded. Odds ratio and multivariate analyses were performed to assess for significant risk factors. Results A total of 1,126 facial burn patients were identified, of which 135 (12%) involved periorbital and orbital injury. Average TBSA burned was 9.68%, with an average facial surface area burned of 1.56%. The most common ocular injury was eyelid burn (65.9%). Ophthalmology was consulted for 118 (87.4%) patients. Short-term ophthalmologic complications were noted in 58 (43%) patients, most commonly chemosis (n = 34, 25.2%). Long-term complications were rare, occurring in only 7 (5.2%) patients. Odds ratio analysis revealed that inhalation injury significantly increased the likelihood of both short- and long-term complications (OR 3.16 and OR 9.81, respectively). Active smoking increased the likelihood of long-term complications (OR 14.76). Ophthalmologic intervention, including need for consult, and use of lubricant, antibiotics, or steroids were each associated with increased risk of short-term complications. On multivariate analysis, those with long-term complications tended to be older (p = 0.045). Those with corneal injury generally had worse outcomes, with higher likelihood of short- and long-term complications (p < 0.001, p = 0.057, respectively). Blindness did not occur in any patient, and no long-term complications occurred in those who did not receive ophthalmologic consult. Neither TBSA nor facial SA burned was associated with the development of short- or long-term complications. Conclusions Providers should obtain early ophthalmologic evaluation and frequent follow-up exams for facial burn patients presenting with advanced age, active smoking status, corneal injury, or inhalation injury to reduce development of long-term complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicFacial Trauma and Fracture ManagementFrench-language works237,207