MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220971174 · doi:10.1063/5.0084060

The third golden age of aeroacoustics

2022· article· en· W4220971174 on OpenAlexafffund
Stéphane Moreau

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputational aeroacousticsAeroacousticsAirfoilPhysicsJet noiseNoise (video)Trailing edgeAirframeAcousticsAerospace engineeringSupersonic speedAerodynamicsWind tunnelMechanicsComputer scienceEngineeringSound pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present review covers the latest evolution of computational aeroacoustics, the field that deals with the noise generated by fluid flows and its propagation in the medium. It highlights the latest findings in both free flows (jet noise) and wall-bounded flows (airfoil, airframe, and turbomachinery noise) in more and more complex environments. Among the computational aero-acoustics methods, high-order schemes of the Navier–Stokes equations on unstructured grids and the lattice Boltzmann method on Cartesian grids have emerged as excellent candidates to tackle noise problems in realistic complex geometries. The latter is also shown to be particularly efficient for both noise generation and propagation, allowing to directly estimate the noise in the far field. Two examples of application of such methods to complex jet noise and to installed airfoil noise are first presented. The first one involves compressible subsonic and supersonic flows in dual-stream nozzles and the second one subsonic flow around an airfoil embedded in the potential core of the open-jet anechoic wind tunnel as in the actual trailing-edge noise experiment. For airframe noise, large eddy simulations of scaled nose landing gear noise and three-element high-lift devices can be tackled to decipher noise sources. For turbomachinery noise, simulations of installed low-speed fans have already unveiled a wealth of details on their noise sources, whereas high-speed turbofans remain a challenge giving the high Reynolds numbers and small tip gaps involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207