MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220976652 · doi:10.21037/acs-2021-pte-14

Pulmonary endarterectomy in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: the Toronto experience

2022· article· en· W4220976652 on OpenAlex
Marc de Perrot, Karen McRae, Laura Donahoe, Etienne Abdelnour‐Berchtold, John Thenganatt, John Granton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Cardiothoracic Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionVascular resistanceExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertensionInternal medicineCardiologyPulmonary thromboendarterectomyHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is associated with higher risks. However, recent evidence suggests that these risks may be mitigated with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 401 consecutive patients undergoing PEA at the Toronto General Hospital between August 2005 and March 2020. Patients with severe CTEPH defined by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 at the time of diagnosis were compared to those with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 Results: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and 6-minute walk distance were worse in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 . A greater proportion of patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 was treated with targeted pulmonary hypertension (PH) medical therapy (38% vs. 18%, P<0.001) and initiated on inotropic support (7% vs. 0.3%, P<0.001) before PEA. Since 2014, the ECMO utilization rate increased in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 compared to those with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 (18% vs. 3.1%, P<0.001). The hospital mortality in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 decreased from 10.3% in 2005–2013 to 1.6% in 2014–2020 (P=0.05), while the hospital mortality in patients with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 remained stable (1.2% in 2005–2013 vs. 2.7% in 2014–2020, P=0.4). The overall survival reached 84% at 10 years in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 compared to 78% in patients with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm –5 (P=0.7). Conclusions: The early and long-term results of PEA in patients with severe CTEPH are excellent despite greater postoperative risks. ECMO as a bridge to recovery after PEA can be useful in patients with severe CTEPH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it