MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220989152 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-9763

Coupling pressure-temperature and time constraints in greenschist- and amphibolite-facies polymetamorphic rocks: a case study from the Austroalpine Unit (Eastern Alps, Austria)

2022· preprint· en· W4220989152 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne Sophie Hollinetz, Benjamin Huet, David Schneider, Christopher R.M. McFarlane, Bernhard Grasemann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNappeMetamorphismGeologyGeochemistryGreenschistMetamorphic rockMetamorphic faciesMonaziteFaciesZirconGeomorphologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In low-grade metamorphic units, precise thermobarometric and geochronologic data are often ambiguous or entirely lacking, thus complicating the temporal interpretation of metamorphism and hampering the identification of complex polymetamorphic histories. We present new P-T-t-D data from samples collected in two Austroalpine nappes exposed in the Eastern Alps, Austria: the structurally upper greenschist-facies Schöckel Nappe (“Graz Paleozoic,” Drauzug-Gurktal Nappe System) and the structurally lower amphibolite-facies Waxenegg Nappe (Koralpe-Wölz Nappe System). Although polymetamorphism was previously inferred from garnet zonation indicating multiphase growth in the Waxenegg Nappe, the timing of metamorphism is poorly resolved and only limited geochronology exists in the Schöckel Nappe. Detailed petrographic investigations revealed that the chloritoid-bearing phyllite and micaschist of the Schöckel Nappe contain allanite that occasionally show partial replacement by small (<10 µm) monazite and thorite. Large (up to 500 µm) monazite exhibiting distinct core-rim chemical zoning were observed in the garnet-bearing micaschist of the Waxenegg Nappe. Careful documentation of the microstructural phase relations, thermodynamic modeling in the MnCNKFMASHT system, Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous matter and in-situ LA-ICPMS U-(Th)-Pb dating of the accessory phases allow us to reconstruct a first metamorphic imprint at ~560°C and 4 kbar in the Waxenegg Nappe at c. 270 Ma (Permian event). Overprinting occurred at ~540°C and 8-10 kbar at c. 90 Ma (Eo-Alpine event). In the Schöckel Nappe, peak metamorphic conditions of ~470°C and 3-4 kbar existed during the Permian event at c. 260 Ma and the Eo-Alpine event in the upper part of the nappe did not exceed lower to middle greenschist-facies conditions. Our results provide unequivocal evidence for Permian metamorphism in the Schöckel Nappe, which was hitherto unknown in this part of the Austroalpine Unit. Moreover, it demonstrates that the main metamorphic signature in this unit occurred during the Permian event and that the Eo-Alpine overprint is relatively lower grade than previously proposed. Combined with the data from the Waxenegg Nappe, there is an obvious marked increase in the Eo-Alpine peak conditions of ~130°C and 5 kbar across the nappe contact with higher grade in the footwall compared to the hanging wall. This is consistent with the existence of a major normal fault between the Drauzug-Gurktal Nappe System and the Koralpe-Wölz Nappe System in the easternmost part of the Austroalpine Unit, as already identified in its central and western parts. Modern thermobarometric analytical approaches coupled with high spatial resolution geochronology on accessory minerals is allowing a more thorough assessment of the subtle metamorphic histories recorded in the fundamentally important low-grade units of orogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→