Transitioning to the Next Era of Modular Construction: Reconfiguration, Reuse, and Building Stock Agility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current era of modular building construction has been largely immutable for the past century in terms of its aspirations, drivers, and objectives. Delivering prompt, cost-effective, and high-quality assets has characterized this era. Yet, a new era is emerging—centered on the post-asset-delivery phase, espoused by prominent circular economy principles. The ability to reconfigure and reuse modular building assemblies in a highly agile manner poses significant opportunities for revolutionizing the environmental and economic impacts of our ever-growing built environment. This paper establishes the groundwork for transitioning toward the next era of modular construction. First, a review of current efforts being made to facilitate this transition is identified. Then, using additional inputs from the industry, a People, Process, Technology (PPT) framework is used to summarize current drivers and constraints. This research provides a cross-sectional analysis of where the modular industry is and how it can transition into its next era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it